I order in this pharmacy is not the first time. As and range of drugs. There are rare medicines that are hard to find in other pharmacies. How to delivery fast cialis australia Thank you for your good work.All is as it should be.

## Adm-n4.dvi

c Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics”
Finite groups with a system of generalized
Let H be a normal subgroup of a finite group G.

A number of authors have investigated the structure of G underthe assumption that all minimal or maximal subgroups in Sylowsubgroups of H are well-situated in G. A general approach to theresults of that kind is proposed in this article. The author has foundthe conditions for p-elements of H under which G-chief p-factors ofH are F-central in G.

All groups considered in this article will be finite. A number of authorshave investigated the structure of a non-nilpotent group G under the as-sumption that all minimal or maximal subgroups in Sylow subgroups ofG are well-situated in G. The first result in this direction was obtained byIto [1]; he proved that a group G of odd order is nilpotent provided that allminimal subgroups of G lie in the center of G. This result was developedby Gasch¨
utz in the following way: if every minimal subgroup of G is nor-
mal in G, then a Sylow 2-subgroup P of G′ is normal and G′/P is nilpo-tent (see [2], Theorem IV.5.7). Buckley [3] also considered the situationwhen minimal subgroups are normal; this means that these subgroupsare U-central normal subgroups where U is the formation of supersolublegroups. Later, some authors [4], [5], [6], [7] extended the mentioned re-sults using formation theory; they investigated groups in which minimalsubgroups lie in F-hypercenter of the group. Other generalizations were
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 20D10.

Key words and phrases: finite group, Qf -central element, formation.

obtained in [8], [9] using the concept of a c-normal subgroup introducedin [10]. A subgroup H of G is called c-normal if there exists a normalsubgroup N of G such that G = HN and H ∩ N ⊆ HG = CoreG(H). Itis clear that if H = a is a c-normal primary cyclic subgroup of G, thenH/HG is either normal or normally complemented; in this case aB lies ina cyclic chief factor A/B of G. A more general approach was proposed ina paper [11] in which a concept of a QF-central element was introduced.

An element a of a group G is called QF-central if there exists a F-centralchief factor A/B of G such that a ∈ A\B. Thus, the general line is toinvestigate a group with a system of QF-central elements. It is inter-esting that groups with given systems of complemented, supplementedor c-supplemented [12] minimal subgroups actually appear groups with asystem of QF-central elements. We recall that Gorchakov [13] proved thata group is supersoluble if all its minimal subgroups are complemented.

We also mention articles [14], [15], [16], [17] in which the groups witha given system of complemented and S-quasinormal minimal subgroupsare investigated.

Analyzing the mentioned papers we can draw a conclusion that they
are connected with the solution of the following question.

Question A. Let F = LF (F ) be a saturated formation, H a normalsubgroup of a group G, p a prime. Assume that all elements of order pin H are QF-central in G. Assume also that if p = 2, then all elementsof order 4 in H are QF-central in G. Is it true that G/CG(A/B) ∈ F (p)for every G-chief factor A/B of H whose order |A/B| is divided by p?
Another line of investigations is concerned with maximal subgroups of
Sylow subgroups. So, Srinivasan [18] proved that a group G is supersolu-ble if maximal subgroups of its Sylow subgroups are normal in G. Clearly,under assumptions of Srinivasan’s theorem every Sylow subgroup P of Gsatisfies the following condition: every element in P \Φ(P ) is QU-centralin G. Srinivasan’s theorem was generalized in [8], [10], [19] by replacingthe normality with the weaker condition of c-normality; besides, in [8] thecondition of c-normality of maximal subgroups of Sylow subgroups in anormal nilpotent subgroup is considered. We also recall S.N.Chernilov’sresult [20] on supersolubility of a group G with abelian Sylow subgroupshaving the following property: every primary cyclic subgroup comple-mented in a Sylow subgroup of G is complemented in G. Vedernikovand Kuleshov [21] established that a group G is supersoluble if every itsprimary cyclic subgroup having a non-trivial supplement in a Sylow p-subgroup of G possesses a non-trivial supplement in G. Analyzing thisline of investigations we arrive at the conclusion that they are concernedwith the following question.

Question B. Let F be a saturated formation, H a normal subgroup of agroup G. Assume that every Sylow subgroup P of H satisfies the followingcondition: every element in P \(Φ(P ) ∪ Φ(G)) is QF-central in G. Is ittrue that every non-Frattini G-chief factor of H is F-central in G?
The main aim of the present article is to give a positive answer to
Questions A and B. Moreover, we give the answer even in a more generalform fixing our attention to the behaviour of p-elements with a fixedprime p.

We use the standard notations [22], [23]. For a prime p, Gp denotes aSylow p-subgroup of G; π(G) is the set of primes dividing |G|; π(F) =
π(G); F ∗(G) is the generalized Fitting subgroup of G, i.e. the
quasinilpotent radical of G [24]. A subgroup M is called a minimal sup-plement to a normal subgroup H of G if M H = G and M1H = G forevery proper subgroup M1 of M.

We need some information from the theory of formations. A for-
mation is a class of groups closed under taking homomorphic imagesand subdirect products. We denote by GF a F-residual of a group G,i.e. the smallest normal subgroup with quotient in F. A formation Fis called saturated if G/Φ(G) ∈ F always implies G ∈ F. A functionf : {primes} → {f ormations} is called a local satellite. A chief factorH/K of G is called f -central in G if G/CG(H/K) ∈ f(p) for every primep dividing |H/K|.

If F is the class of all groups whose chief factors are f -central, then
we say that f is a local satellite of F and write F = LF (f ). A localsatellite f of a formation F is called: 1) full if f (p) = Npf(p) for everyprime p (here Np is the class of p-groups); 2) integrated if f(p) ⊆ F forevery prime p; 3) semi-integrated if for every prime p, f (p) is either asubformation in F or the class E of all groups; 4) canonical if it is fulland integrated; 5) semicanonical if it is full and semi-integrated. Thenotation LF (F ) means that F is a canonical local satellite of LF (F ). Achief factor H/K of G is called F-central in G if it is f -central, where fis the canonical local satellite of F.

In the proofs of our results we will use the following theorems.

2.1. Every non-empty saturated formation possesses a semicanonical localsatellite and the unique canonical local satellite (see [22], [23], [25]).

2.2. Let f be a local satellite such that f (p) = (1) and f (q) = E for everyprime q = p. Then LF (f ) is the class of p-nilpotent groups [2].

2.3.(a) Let f be a satellite such that f (p) is the class of all abelian groupswith exponents dividing p − 1, and f (p) = E for every prime q = p. ThenLF (f ) is the class p-U of p-supersoluble groups.

(b) Let a prime p divide the order of a chief factor H/K of G. Then
H/K is p-U-central if and only if |H/K| = p ( [2], Kapitel VI).

2.4. Let F be a saturated formation and H a normal subgroup of a groupG such that H/H ∩Φ(G) ∈ F. Then H = A×B where A ∈ F, B ⊆ Φ(G),π(B) ∩ π(F) = ∅ ( [23], Theorem 4.2).

2.5. Let H be a normal subgroup of G such that H/H ∩ Φ(G) is p-nilpotent. Then H is p-nilpotent [2], [23].

2.6. Let F = LF (f ) where f is semi-integrated. Let H/L be a G-chieffactor of GF such that f (p) ⊆ F for some p ∈ π(H/L). Then H/L isf -eccentric in G if one of the following conditions holds: 1) H/L is non-Frattini in G; 2) a Sylow p-subgroup in GF is abelian ( [23], Theorems8.1 and 11.6).

2.7. If G = AB, then for every prime p there exist Sylow p-subgroupsAp, Bp and Gp in A, B and G such that Gp = ApBp ( [23], p. 134).

2.8. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G. Let α and β be G-chiefseries of H. Then there exists a one-to-one correspondence between thechief factors of α and those of β such that the corresponding factors areG-isomorphic and such that the Frattini chief factors of α correspond tothe Frattini chief factors of β ( [22], Theorem A.9.13).

2.9. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G, and let M be a minimalsupplement to H in G. If M contains at least one Sylow p-subgroup ofH for some prime p, then H is p-nilpotent ( [26]; [23], Theorem 12.4).

2.10. Let F be a saturated formation, and H a normal subgroup of agroup G such that every G-chief factor of H is F-central in G. ThenG/CG(H) ∈ F (see [23], Theorem 9.5).

2.11. If G is a group, then CG(F ∗(G)) ⊆ F (G) (see [25], Theorem15.22).

2.12. (a) Let p be an odd prime. A group G is p-nilpotent if every itselement of order p is Q-central in G.

(b) A group G is 2-nilpotent if every its 2-element of order ≤ 4 is
Q-central in G (see [11], Theorem 2).

2.13. Let F be a saturated formation and H a normal subgroup of a groupG. Let ω be the set of primes p such that HF possesses an abelian Sylowp-subgroup. Then there exists a subgroup C of G such that G = CHF andπ(C ∩ HF) ∩ ω = ∅ (see [23], Theorem 11.8).

If a Sylow p-subgroup of a p-soluble group G is abelian, then
lp(G) ≤ 1 (see [23], Theorem 5.11).

2.15. Let G = a B, where a = 1 is a 2-subgroup and B = G. Thenthere exists a normal maximal subgroup M of G such that G = a M(see [21], Lemma 1).

a p-subgroup. Assume that Hp is abelian and G is p-soluble. Then a is aQU-central element of G.

Proof. Let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then we can assumethat BG = Op′(H) = 1. By 2.14, Hp is normal in G. We have that
Evidently, Hp∩B is normal in G. Since BG = 1, it follows that Hp∩B = 1,and Hp = a is normal in G.

For a prime p and a group H, we use the following conventions:
Wp(H) = {x : x ∈ H, |x| = p} if p is odd,W2(H) = {x : x ∈ H, |x| ∈ {2, 4}},W (H) = {x : x ∈ H, |x| is a prime or |x| = 4}.

Definition 3.1 (see [11], Definition 3). Let f be a local satellite. Anelement a of a group G is called Qf -central in G if there exists a f -central chief factor A/B of G such that a ∈ A\B. The identity elementis always regarded as a Qf -central element.

Definition 3.2. Let F = LF (f ) be a saturated formation, where f is anintegrated local satellite of F. An element a of G is called QF-central ifit is Qf -central.

It is easy to show that Definition 3.2 does not depend on the choice
Definition 3.3. An element a of G is called Q-central if it is QN-central(this means that there exists a central chief factor A/B of G such thata ∈ A\B).

Theorem 3.1. Let p be a prime, and F = LF (f ) a saturated formation,where f is a semicanonical local satellite such that f (p) ⊆ F and f (q) = Efor every prime q = p. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G. Assumethat every element in Wp(H) is Qf-central in G. Then every G-chieffactor of H is f -central in G.

Proof. We will use induction on |G|+|H|. Let W = Wp(H) = {xi : i ∈ I}.

We may assume that W = ∅. Assume that there is a normal p′-subgroupK = 1 in G. Consider the natural epimorphism α : G → G/K. Evidently,W α = Wp(HK/K). If xi ∈ W , then by assumption,there is a f-centralchief factor A/B of G such that xi ∈ A\B. The factors AK/BK andA/B(A ∩ K) are G-isomorphic; besides, it follows from xi ∈ A\B thatA = B(A ∩ K) because every p-element in B(A ∩ K) is contained in B.

Hence, B = B(A ∩ K). We have that xi ∈ AK\BK, and AK/BK is af -central chief factor of G. But then, (AK)α/(BK)α is a f -central chieffactor of Gα. Clearly, xαi ∈ (AK)α\(BK)α. By the inductive hypothesis,the theorem is true for G/K. Then it is also true for G. So, we mayassume that Op′(G) = 1.

Consider an arbitrary element xi in W . By assumption, there is a
f -central chief factor A/B of G such that xi ∈ A\B. We have
AH/BH ≃ A/A ∩ BH = A/B(A ∩ H).

Since xi ∈ A\B, the equality B = B(A ∩ H) is impossible. Therefore,
A = B(A∩H), and we have that A/B and A∩H/B ∩H are G-isomorphicG-chief factors. So, we showed that for each xi ∈ W , there is a G-chieffactor Xi/Yi of H such that xi ∈ Xi\Yi and Xi/Yi is f-central in G. Set
Clearly, G/C ∈ f (p) ∈ F. Therefore, every G-chief factor of HC/C is
f -central. If H ∩ C = H, then, by the inductive hypothesis, every G-chieffactor of H ∩ C is f -central in G, and the theorem is proved. So, we mayassume that H ⊆ C. This means that every element in W is Q-centralin C. By 2.12, H is p-nilpotent. Since Op′(G) = 1, we have that H isa p-group. Let Q be a Sylow q-subgroup in C, q = p. Then we havethat every element in W is Q-central in QH. By 2.12, QH is p-nilpotent.

Since G/C ∈ f (p) = Npf(p) and Cq centralizes every G-chief p-factor ofH for every prime q = p, it follows that every G-chief p-factor of H isf -central in G. The theorem is proved.

Corollary 3.1.1. Let F be a saturated formation, and G a group suchthat every element in W (G) is QF-central in G. Then G ∈ F.

Proof. Applying Theorem 1 for the case H = G and for the arbitraryprime p, we obtain that every chief factor of G is F-central. So, G ∈ F,and the result is true.

Corollary 3.1.2. Let F be a saturated formation, and H a normal sub-group of a group G such that G/H ∈ F and every element in W (F ∗(H))
Proof. By Theorem 3.1, every G-chief factor of F ∗(H) is F-central in G.

By 2.10, G/CG(F ∗(H)) belongs to F. From this and from G/H ∈ F itfollows that G/CH(F ∗(H)) ∈ F. By 2.11, CH(F ∗(H)) is contained inF ∗(H). Therefore G/F ∗(H) belongs to F, and we have that G ∈ F.

Corollary 3.1.3. Let p be a prime, and H a normal subgroup of a groupG. If every element in Wp(H) is Q-central in G, then H is p-nilpotent,and H/Op′(H) lies in the hypercenter of G/Op′(H).

Corollary 3.1.4. Let p be a prime, and H a normal subgroup of a groupG. Assume that every element in Wp(H) is QU-central in G. Then H isp-supersoluble, and every G-chief p-factor of H is cyclic.

We introduce the subgroup Op′,Φ(G) as follows:
Op′,Φ(G)/Op′(G) = Φ(G/Op′(G)).

Theorem 3.2. Let p be a prime, and F = LF (f ) a saturated formation,where f is a semicanonical local satellite such that f (p) ⊆ F and f (q) = Efor every prime q = p. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G. Assumethat every element in Hp\(Φ(Hp)∪Φ(G)) is Qf-central in G. Then everyG-chief factor of H/H ∩ Op′,Φ(G) is f-central in G/H ∩ Op′,Φ(G).

Proof. We will prove this theorem using induction on |H| + |G|. Assumethat there is a normal p′-subgroup K = 1 in G such that K ⊆ H.

Consider the natural epimorphism α : G → G/K. If a ∈ Hp, thenaα belongs to a Sylow p-subgroup Hα
p ) ∪ Φ(Gα). Since HpK/K ≃ Hp, it follows that a is
not contained in Φ(Hp). Furthermore, it follows from (Φ(G))α ⊆ Φ(Gα)that a is not contained in Φ(G). By assumption, there is a f -centralchief factor A/B of G such that a ∈ A\B. The factors AK/BK andA/B(A ∩ K) are G-isomorphic; besides, it follows from a ∈ A\B thatA = B(A ∩ K) because every p-element in B(A ∩ K) is contained in B.

Hence, B = B(A ∩ K). We have that a ∈ AK\BK, and AK/BK is af -central chief factor of G. But then, (AK)α/(BK)α is a f -central chieffactor of Gα. Clearly, aα ∈ (AK)α\(BK)α. By the inductive hypothesis,the theorem is true for G/K. Then it is also true for G.

So, we may assume that Op′(H) = 1. Consider H ∩ GF. We may
assume that H ∩ GF has non-Frattini G-chief factors. We call a normalsubgroup L of G f -limit if L/L∩Φ(G) is a f -eccentric G-chief factor. Theset Σ of f -limit subgroups contained in H ∩ GF is not empty. Really, ifL/(Φ(G) ∩ H ∩ GF) is a minimal normal subgroup in G/(Φ(G) ∩ H ∩ GF),where L ⊆ H ∩ GF, then L is f -limit by 2.6. So, let L be a subgroup
of minimal order in Σ. Set Φ = L ∩ Φ(G). It follows from Op′(H) = 1and 2.5 that p divides |L/Φ|. Let M/Φ be a minimal supplement forL/Φ in G/Φ. Then by 2.7 we have Gp = MpLp. By 2.9, Mp/Φ doesnot contain Lp/Φ; hence, M = G. From Gp = MpLp it follows thatHp = Gp ∩ H = (Hp ∩ Mp)Lp, where Hp ∩ Mp does not contain Lp.

Hence, there is an element a in Lp\(Hp ∩ Mp) such that a ∈ Φ(Hp).

Since Hp ∩ Mp ⊇ Φ = L ∩ Φ(G), we have that a ∈ Φ(G). So, we get
By assumption, G possesses a f -central chief factor A/B such that
a ∈ A\B. Consider AL/BL ≃ A/B(A ∩ L). Since A/B is a chief factor,B(A ∩ L) is either equal B or else A. Since a belongs to A ∩ L and doesnot belong to B, we have that B = B(A ∩ L). Hence, A = B(A ∩ L).

So, we have G-isomorphic G-chief factors A/B and A ∩ L/B ∩ L; besides,a ∈ (A ∩ L)\(B ∩ L).

Suppose that A∩L/B ∩L is a non-Frattini chief factor of G. Then, by
2.8, A∩L/B ∩L is G-isomorphic with L/Φ. In this case, L/Φ is f -centralin G. This contradicts 2.6. So, we obtained that A ∩ L/B ∩ L is a Frattinichief factor of G. If B ∩ L is not contained in Φ(G), we have that B ∩ Lpossesses a f -limit normal subgroup of G; this contradicts the minimalityof |L|. Therefore, B ∩ L ⊆ Φ(G). We get A ∩ L ⊆ Φ(G). Hence,a ∈ A ∩ L ⊆ Φ(G). We arrive at a contradiction, because a ∈ Φ(G). Thetheorem is proved.

Corollary 3.2.1. Let F be a saturated formation, H a normal subgroupof a group G such that G/H ∈ F and for every prime p the followingcondition holds: each element in Hp\(Φ(Hp) ∪ Φ(G)) is QF-central in G.

Then G ∈ F.

Corollary 3.2.2. Let F be a saturated formation, H a normal solublesubgroup of a group G such that G/H ∈ F and the following conditionholds: if P is a Sylow subgroup of F (H), then each element in P \(Φ(P )∪Φ(G)) is QF-central in G. Then G ∈ F.

Proof. Let Φ = Φ(G) ∩ F (H). By Theorem 3.2, every G-chief fac-tor of F (H)/Φ is F-central in G. By 2.5, F (H)/Φ = F (H/Φ). By2.10, G/Φ/CG/Φ(F (H/Φ)) ∈ F. Therefore, G/CG(F (H)/Φ) ∈ F. Fromthis and from G/H ∈ F it follows that G/CH(F (H)/Φ) ∈ F. ButCH(F (H)/Φ) ⊆ F (H). Hence, G/Φ ∈ F. Since F is saturated, wehave that G ∈ F.

Corollary 3.2.3. Let p be a prime, and H be a normal subgroup of agroup G. Assume that every element in Hp\(Φ(Hp) ∪ Φ(G)) is Q-central
in G. Then H is p-nilpotent, and every its non-Frattini G-chief p-factoris central in G.

Corollary 3.2.4. Let p be a prime, and H be a normal subgroup of agroup G. Assume that every element in Hp\(Φ(Hp)∪Φ(G)) is QU-centralin G. Then H is p-supersoluble, and every its non-Frattini G-chief p-factor is cyclic.

Corollary 3.2.5. A group G is supersoluble if for every non-cyclic Sy-low subgroup P of G the following condition holds: every element inP \(Φ(P ) ∪ Φ(G)) is QU-central in G.

Proof. If G2 is non-cyclic, then by Theorem 3.2, G is 2-supersoluble. IfG2 is cyclic, then G is 2-nilpotent. Thus, G is soluble, and by Theorem3.2, G is p-supersoluble for all prime p such that Gp is non-cyclic.

Definition 3.4. An element a = 1 of an abelian group P is called basicif there exists a subgroup B in P such that P = a × B. We denote byB(P ) the set of all basic elements in P.

The following theorem generalizes S.N.Chernikov’s result [20] on a
finite group with a system of complemented subgroups.

Theorem 3.3. Let p be a prime, and F = LF (f ) a saturated formationof p-soluble groups, where f is a semicanonical local satellite such thatf (p) ⊆ F and f (q) = E for every prime q = p. Let H be a normalsubgroup of a group G. Assume that Hp is abelian and every element inB(Hp) is Qf-central in G. Then every G-chief factor of H is f-centralin G.

Proof. We will use induction on |H| + |G|. As well as in the proof
of Theorem 3.2, it is easy to show that the assumption of the theorem isvalid for G/Op′(H) and H/Op′(H). So, we may assume that Op′(H) = 1.

We will consider two cases: H = G and H = G.

Case 1. Assume that H = G. Consider the F-residual R of G. By
2.13, there exists a subgroup C such that G = CR and p does not divide|C ∩ R|. By 2.7, Gp = CpRp and Cp ∩ Rp ⊆ C ∩ R. So, Gp = Cp × Rp.

It follows from this that B(Rp) ⊆ B(Gp).

It is clear that B(Rp)\Φ(G) = ∅. Consider a ∈ B(Rp)\Φ(G). By
assumption, there is a f -central chief factor A/B of G such that a ∈A\B. We have that AR/BR is G-isomorphic with A/B(A ∩ R). Sincea ∈ A\B, it follows that A = B(A ∩ R). Thus, A/B and A ∩ R/B ∩ Rare G-isomorphic f -central G-chief factors. This contradicts 2.6. So, thetheorem is true for the case H = G.

Case 2. Now we assume that H = G. Let H be the formation of p-
soluble groups. By 2.13, there exists a subgroup C such that G = CHH
and p does not divide |C ∩ HH|. By 2.7, Gp = CpHH
p are Sylow p-subgroups in G, C and H H. Evidently, Gp ∩ H = Hp is
a Sylow p-subgroup of H. Furthermore, Gp ∩ HH = HH
tion of the theorem there exists a f -central chief factor A/B of G suchthat a ∈ A\B. Since all groups in f (p) are p-soluble, A/B is a p-group.

Consider
AHH/BHH ≃ A/A ∩ BHH = A/B(A ∩ HH).

Since a ∈ (A ∩ HH)\B, we have that B = B(A ∩ HH). Therefore,A = B(A∩HH). We have that A/B and A∩HH/B∩HH are G-isomorphicG-chief factors. Since Hp is contained in CH(A ∩ HH/B ∩ HH) we havethat
Thus, there is a H-central chief p-factor D1/D2 of H such that
A ∩ HH ⊇ D1 ⊃ D2 ⊇ B ∩ HH.

p ) is empty and H is p-soluble. Since Op′ (H ) =
1 and Hp is abelian, it follows by 2.14 that Hp is normal. Clearly, we canassume that H is a p-group. Let B(H) = {xi : i ∈ I}. By assumption,for every i ∈ I there exists a f -central G-chief factor Ai/Bi such thatxi ∈ Ai\Bi. We set
Then factors AiH/BiH and Ai/BiXi are G-isomorphic. Since xi ∈ Xi\B,we have that Bi = BiXi. Thus, Ai = BiXi. So, Ai/Bi and Xi/Yiare G-isomorphic f -central chief factors of G. It follows from this thatG/CG(Xi/Yi) ∈ f(p). We have that
It follows from this that every element xi in B(H) is Q-central in HCq
for every prime q = p. For HCq the theorem is true (we note that byCase 1, the theorem is true if a considered normal subgroup coincideswith the whole group). Applying the proved part of the theorem to HCqand the formation of p-nilpotent groups we have that HCq is p-nilpotent.

Therefore, CC(X/Y ) is a p-group for every G-chief factor X/Y of H. ButG/C ∈ f (p). We see that G/CG(X/Y ) belongs to Npf(p) = f(p), thatis X/Y is f -central in G. The theorem is proved.

Corollary 3.3.1. Let p be a prime. Assume that a normal subgroup Hof a group G possesses an abelian Sylow p-subgroup P . Assume also thatevery element in B(P ) is QU-central in G. Then H is p-supersoluble, andevery G-chief p-factor of H is cyclic.

Corollary 3.3.2. Let p be a prime. Assume that a normal subgroup Hof a group G possesses an abelian Sylow p-subgroup P . Assume also thatevery element in B(P ) is Q-central in G. Then H is p-nilpotent, andevery G-chief p-factor of H is central in G.

Corollary 3.3.3. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G. Assumethat a Sylow 2-subgroup P of H is abelian and has the following property:
a is complemented in G for every a ∈ B(P ). Then H is 2-nilpotent,
and every its G-chief 2-factor is central in G.

Proof. By 2.15, every element in B(P ) is Q-central in G. Now we applyCorollary 3.3.2.

Corollary 3.3.4. Let H be a normal subgroup of a group G. Assumethat for every Sylow subgroup P of G the following condition holds: P isabelian, and a is complemented in G for every a ∈ B(P ). Then H issupersoluble, and every its G-chief factor is cyclic.

Proof. By Corollary 3.3.3, H is 2-nilpotent. So, H is soluble. Let P bea Sylow p-subgroup of H, p ∈ π(H). By assumption, for every a ∈ B(P )we have that
By 2.16, a is QU-central in G. Now we apply Corollary 3.3.1.

Corollary 3.3.5 (see [20]). Assume that every Sylow p-subgroup P of Gis abelian and satisfies the following condition: if a ∈ B(P ), then a iscomplemented in G. Then G is supersoluble.

Uber eine zur Frattini-Gruppe duale Bildung, Nagoya Math. J., 9, 1955,
[2] B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York,
[3] J. Buckley, Finite groups whose minimal subgroups are normal, Math. Z., 116,
[4] A. Yokoyama, Finite solvable groups whose F-hypercenter containes all minimal
subgroups, Arch. Math., 26, 1970, pp. 123-130.

[5] A. Yokoyama, Finite solvable groups whose F-hypercenter containes all minimal
subgroups II, Arch. Math., 27, 1976, pp. 572-575.

[6] R. Laue, Dualization of saturation for locally defined formations, J. Algebra, 52,
[7] J. B. Derr, W. E. Deskins, N. R. Mukherjee, The influence of minimal p-subgroups
on the structure of finite groups, Arch. Math., 45, 1985, pp. 1-4.

[8] Wei Huaquan, On c-normal maximal and minimal subgroups of Sylow subgroups
of finite groups, Comm. Algebra, 29, 5, 2001, pp. 2193-2200.

[9] Miao Long, Guo Wenbin, The influence of c-normality of subgroups on the struc-
ture of finite groups, Proc. F.Scorina Gomel Univ.,3(16), 2000, pp.101-106.

[10] Y. Wang, c-Normality of groups and its properties, J. Algebra, 180, 1996, pp.

[11] Kh. A. Al-Sharo, L. A. Shemetkov, On subgroups of prime order in a finite group,
Ukrainian Math. J., 54, 2002, pp. 915-923 (translated from Ukr. Mat. Zh., 54,2002, pp. 745-752).

[12] Y. Wang, Finite groups with some subgroups of Sylow subgroups c-supplemented,
[13] Yu.M.Gorchakov, Primitively factorizable groups, Proc. Perm Univ., 17, 1960,
[14] A. Ballester-Bolinches, Guo Xiuyun, On complemented subgroups of finite groups,
[15] Guo Xiuyun, K. P. Shum, A. Ballester-Bolinches, On complemented minimal
subgroups in finite groups, J. Group theory, 6, 2003, pp. 159-167.

[16] M. Asaad, A. Ballester-Bolinches, M. C. Pedraza Aguilera, A note on minimal
subgroups of finite groups, Comm. Algebra, 24(8), 1996, pp. 2771-2776.

o, The influence of minimal subgroups on the structure of
finite groups, Arch. Math., 72, 1999, pp. 401-404.

[18] S. Srinivasan, Two sufficient conditions for supersolvability of finite groups, Isr.

[19] Li Deyu, Guo Xiuyun, The influence of c-normality of subgroups on the structure
of finite groups II, Comm. Algebra, 26, 1998, pp. 1913-1922.

[20] S. N. Chernikov, Finite supersoluble groups with abelian Sylow subgroups, in the
book: Groups defined by the properties of systems of subgroups, Math. Inst.

Akad. Nauk USSR, Kiev, 1979, pp. 3-15.

[21] V. A. Vedernikov, N. I. Kuleshov, A characterization of finite supersoluble groups,
Problems in Algebra, 9, 1996, pp. 107-113.

[22] K. Doerk, T. Hawkes, Finite soluble groups, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York,
[23] L. A. Shemetkov, Formations of finite groups, Nauka, Moscow, 1978.

[24] M. Suzuki, Group theory II, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin-Heidelberg-Tokyo,
[25] L. A. Shemetkov, A. N. Skiba, Formations of algebraic systems, Nauka, Moscow,
[26] L. A. Shemetkov, Complements and supplements to normal subgroups of finite
groups, Ukr. Mat. Zh., 23, 1971, pp. 678-689.

Russian Economic Academy named afterG. V. Plekhanov, Stremyanny per.

113054 Moscow, RussiaE-Mail: protechpro@mtu.ru
Received by the editors: 12.04.2004and final form in 06.12.2004.

Source: http://adm.luguniv.edu.ua/downloads/issues/2004/N4/adm-n4-6.pdf

CAMRESEARCH Magazine for Complimentary and Alternative Medicine Professionals – United Kingdom PHYTOTHERAPY Herbals outperform antibiotics in treatment of Lyme Disease One of the world's leading Lyme Disease researchers has tested a natural treatment protocol based on the Cat's claw (Uncaria tomentosa) product Samento and Banderol (from the Otoba plant) and found that it is at le

F R A G E N S A M M L U N G N E U R O L O G I E 1. Welche Aussagen zu Motoneuronerkrankungen sind richtig? i. Schmerzlose atrophische Paresen der Oberarmmuskulatur können Frühzeichen einer amyotrophen ii. Ursache der amyotrophen Lateralsklerose ist eine Trinukleotid-Expansion innerhalb eines Gens, das für die Entgiftung intrazellulär entstehender freier Radikale von Bedeutung ist. iii. Da